We present extensive numerical calculations for a model of thermal convection of a Boussinesq fluid in an equatorial annulus of a rotating spherical shell. The convection induces and maintains differential rotation and meridian circulation. The model is solved for an effective Prandtl number P = ... Show moreWe present extensive numerical calculations for a model of thermal convection of a Boussinesq fluid in an equatorial annulus of a rotating spherical shell. The convection induces and maintains differential rotation and meridian circulation. The model is solved for an effective Prandtl number P = 1, with effective Taylor number T in the range 10² < T < 10⁶, and effective Rayleigh number R between the critical value for onset of convection, and a few times that value. With Ω = 2.6 x 10⁻⁶ sec⁻¹, d = 1.4 x 10¹⁰cm (roughly the depth of the solar convection zone) the range of Taylor number is equivalent to kinematic viscosities between 10&¹⁴ and 10¹² cm²/sec, which encompasses eddy viscosities estimated from mixing length theory applied to the sun. The convection does generally make equatorial regions rotate faster, the more so as T is increased, but local equatorial deceleration near the surface is also produced at intermediate T for large enough R above critical. The differential rotation is maintained primarily through momentum transport in the cells up the gradient, rather than by meridian circulation. Differential rotation energy increases relative to cell energy with increasing T, surpassing it near T = 3 x 10⁴. The differential rotation tends to stretch out the convective cells, analogously to what is thought to happen to solar magnetic regions. Differential rotation and meridian circulations energies are nearly equal for T = 10³, but the meridian circulation energy falls off relative to differential rotation like T⁻¹ for larger T. The meridian circulation is always toward the poles near the surface, contrary to models of Kippenhahn, Cocke, Kohler, and Durney and Roxburgh. The radial shear produced in the differential rotation is almost always positive, as in the Kohler model, but contrary to the assumptions made by Leighton for his random walk solar cycle model. Solutions in the neighborhood of T = 3 x 10⁴ seem to compare best with various solar observations including differential rotation amplitude, cell wavelength, tilted structure, horizontal momentum transport, and weak meridian circulation. The local equatorial deceleration (equatorward of 10 - 15°) has not been observed, although the techniques of data analysis may not have been sensitive to it. The most important deficiency of the model is that all the solutions with T > 10³ show the vertical heat transport a rather strong function of latitude, with a maximum at the equator, no evidence of which is seen at the solar surface. Show less
